Balancing act with balanced scorecards


Today it is imperative for managers to recognize the impact that measures have on performance and be prompt at locating any aberrations from the target. Effective measurement must be an integral part of the management process.

Balanced Scorecard—is one such management tool that provides executives with a comprehensive framework that translates a company’s strategic objectives into a coherent set of performance measures.

The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that helps everyone in an organization understand and work towards a shared vision. Strategic performance measures are used to better inform decision-making and show progress toward desired results. It was originated as a performance measurement framework that added strategic non-financial performance measures to traditional financial metrics to give managers and executives a more 'balanced' view of organizational performance. The balanced scorecard has evolved from its early use as a simple performance measurement framework to a full strategic planning and management system. The “new” balanced scorecard transforms an organization’s strategic plan from an attractive but passive document into the "marching orders" for the organization on a daily basis. It provides a framework that not only provides performance measurements, but helps planners identify what should be done and measured. It enables executives to truly execute their strategies.

The balanced scorecard is not a rocket science, designed formula, template or software that can be applied to businesses in general or even industry-wide. Unfortunately, many people believe that implementing software amounts to implementing a balanced scorecard. But the fact is different market situations, product strategies, and competitive environments require different scorecards. Business units devise customized scorecards to fit their mission, strategy, technology, and culture. . In fact, a critical test of a scorecard’s success is its transparency: from the 15 to 20 scorecard measures, an observer should be able to see through to the business unit’s competitive strategy.

The balanced scorecard emphasizes that financial and non- financial measures must be part of information system for employees at all level of organization. Front-line employees must understand the financial consequences for their decisions and actions and similarly the senior-level executives must understand the drivers of long term financial success. Balanced scorecard retains the traditional financial measures. However it expands business objectives beyond summary financial measures. Corporate executives can now measure how their business units create value for current and future customers and how they must enhance internal capabilities and the investment in people, systems and procedures necessary to improve future performance. The objectives and measures of the scorecard view organizational performance from four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process and learning and growth. These four perspectives provide the framework for the balanced scorecard.


The balanced scorecard provides managers with the instrumentation they need to navigate to future competitive success. Today, organizations are competing in complex environments so that an accurate understanding of their goals and the methods of attaining those goals is vital. The balanced scorecard translates an organization’s mission and strategy into a comprehensive set of performance measures that provides the framework for a strategic measurement and management system.

P.S.: This post is based on my understanding of a balanced scorecard. Anybody who can throw further light on the subject can feel free to give their views on the same in the comment box.

3 comments:

Ashutosh Didwania said...

Wow...awesome stuff Anushree...I'd heard about balanced scorecard so any times but never really tried to dig into it..This article pretty much clears up all my basics of this tool...It really seems to be such a well-rounded instrument and could easily have diverse applications...In fact I guess the balanced scorecard could be tons of applications both in business perspective as well as personal life...How? Use your brains..After reading this post, I've already started working on different versions of the BC..Let me dig deeper and I'll post them very soon...

// The balanced scorecard is not a rocket science, designed formula, template or software that can be applied to businesses in general or even industry-wide. Unfortunately, many people believe that implementing software amounts to implementing a balanced scorecard. //

That's so very true..Being from the IT industry, I have seen people literally thinking in terms of software being a complete substitute for so many other perspectives which seriously isn't that wise...

Great stuff from you..waiting for the next one...

Prashant evolving.. said...

One doubt here
in the figure arrow shows interdependence between all four measures but
1.does learning and growth does not contribute to financial in any way and how does financials of the company helps in achieving customer satisfaction and internal business improvement or the arrow has othe meaning which are out of my grasp.
Kindly explain

Anushree Agarwal said...

valid question Prashant..but i blive u have a wrong hold on the entire strategy mapping..
balanced scorecard provides a frame work that not only provides performance measurements, but helps planners identify what should be done and measured..
BS suggests that organisation should be viewed 4m 4 diff perspectives, and to develop metrics, collect data and analyse it relative to each of these perspectives.
learning and growth perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes.
business process perspective helps to know how well the business is running and whether the products offered conform to customer satisfaction
customer perspective relates to customer focus..they should be analysed in terms of kinds of customers and the process for which product is provided.
financial perspective relates to timely and accurate funding.
strategy mapping shown in the diagram shows a logical, step-by-step connection between strategic objectives(shown as ovals on the map) in the form of cause and effect chain.
improving performance in the objectives found in the Learning & Growth perspective (the bottom row) enables the organization to improve its Internal Process perspective Objectives (the next row up), which in turn enables the organization to create desirable results in the Customer and Financial perspectives (the top two rows). i hope i am justified in answering your query..:)